<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - Should you buy, hold or sell the big four banks?</title>
	<description>The Invast team has been writing about banking valuations since May 2014 and we think it's not too late to sell the banks at these levels.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=141384029</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:25 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:25 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by James Mair  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>You consider the banks are a sell, and the idea that they are currently heading down seems to agree with that thinking. However, there is data that basically rejects that assessment: just a couple of years ago, CBA shares dropped to $25 yet last March they were in excess of $96, therefore it would seem that the best advice would be to sell - but why not wait until they revive, and then to sell? Sure, you can sell now and wait until they go further - but what if they don't, it's always a cycle anyway?</p>
<p>Dividend payments may have no bearing on your view, but a lot of retirees buy, and rely on, shares for the dividend income regardless of price. Yes, share prices fall, but they go up again and if the banks go bust then the country has gone bankrupt as well . . . regardless of how much you may have in a bank account, it's going to be worthless.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>James Mair  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:39:25 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Brad  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Remember though that the government guarantees deposits of up to $250k per institution, so if there is a default you should be protected as a depositor. There is no such guarantee on share prices and although like you said, they usually go up again at some stage, it doesn't always happen in the time frame that you want - especially if you are a retired person. Likewise there is also no guarantee of future dividend payments. You should never buy shares based on dividends alone " regardless of price" as you mentioned, despite the temptation to increase your income. I think preservation of capital is more important at the moment.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Brad  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:18:07 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by James Mair  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Hi Brad. Yes, I tend to agree, although I did say: "but a lot of retirees buy, and rely on, shares for the dividend income regardless of price," not all retirees. I did buy CBA 12 years ago because of the needed divided income. Preservation of capital, where it is certainly important, at any time of buying shares, that thought would have to have been a hindsight judgement, However, winding back the clock is not easy for retirees like myself.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>James Mair  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:34:47 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>