<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - 'Limiting negatively-geared properties per taxpayer would be bad policy'</title>
	<description>We ask Neville Sanders, president of the Real Estate Institute of Australia, for his thoughts on these potential restrictions.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=141384762</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 21:08:13 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 21:08:13 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Devona  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>"Data shows that around two-thirds of property investors who utilise negative gearing earn a taxable income of $80,001 or less a year"</p>
<p>Are retirees excluded from this figure?</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Devona  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 21:08:13 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>