<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - 'I trust numbers more than I trust financial planners'</title>
	<description>"I sort of trust algorithms more than financial planners who are linked to the products of their institutions," says mathematician and robo adviser client Lara Jordan.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=141534059</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:19:51 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:19:51 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Ray  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>If this lady is a mathematician, then the first thing she should have seen is stockspots high fees at 0.9% and for what? A blend of ETFs no different to what she is more than capable of doing herself with basic 50% growth 50% balance etc. Or whatever blend she feels safe with. This push to robo advice might dodge the financial advisor scammers but at such high fees in Oz is still a joke. Wow. Just pick a few vanguard or low fee ETFs in the ratios you are happy with and save up to 0.9%.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Ray  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:19:51 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>