<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - Why couples' health insurance policies are a waste of money</title>
	<description>Joint health insurance for couples might be more convenient than taking out two separate policies, but it will cost you.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=141564887</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 13:16:08 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 13:16:08 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Kate  ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>When I had my children (30 years ago), I was told by my fund we'd need a family policy to cover any extra needs the baby might have in hospital right from birth. Ie an individual policy covering only me would not cut it. I don't know whether that was true; not wanting to take the risk, we changed to the family cover. Even that long ago the waiting time for pregnancy cover was more than 9 months.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Kate  ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 13:16:08 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>