<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - The super reforms that were - and weren't - in the Budget</title>
	<description>There was no pulling back of the mandatory super increase in the Budget, as Treasurer Josh Frydenberg announced a raft of super reforms.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=175037192</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:46:13 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:46:13 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Arthur Pritchard ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>To assume the legislated increase in the super guarantee will go ahead just because there was no mention in the budget is taking a long bow.</p>
<p>The Morrison Govt has shown continually its disdain for industry super funds. Ministers and backbenchers have provided ample commentary of their belief the increase should not go ahead at every opportunity.</p>
<p>Just because there was no budget mention does not mean their views have evaporated.</p>
<p>If stalling or even stopping completely any increase,under the guise of business can&#39;t afford it or it will be at the cost of wage increase, could be achieved through the Senate then one suspects this govt would do so.</p>
<p>Arthur Pritchard</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Pritchard ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 07:46:13 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>