<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - How the tax concession system is stacked against Aussie women</title>
	<description>Of the $60 billion in tax concessions handed out to Aussies each year, just $18 billion goes to women.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=179197575</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 14:55:44 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 14:55:44 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by justin willis ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>&quot;Asteroid Hits Earth! Women Most Affected!&quot;</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>justin willis ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 14:55:44 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by S Y ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Most men are married and most women are married, so there&#39;s lots of pooling of finances even if money/assets are in a single name.</p>
<p>Stop trying to divide people into &#39;tribes&#39;.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>S Y ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 16:48:11 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Lisa Apps ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Just because something isnt equal doesnt mean it is unjust or unfair.. .had to roll my eyes at this headline and article quoting some report by some left wing educational group no doubt, suggesting the bad bad patriarchy is at work again. The differences in stats for pay gap have less to do with designed inequality or suppression than it does general roles in society, hours willing to work and type of jobs with varying rates of pay... women tend to work less once they start family because we are natural nurturers, plus half of us are single mums, I think you need to do more open minded research and reporting for a journalist. last I heard there was minimum wages and laws that ensured wages and tax deductions are applied equally to any person regardless of gender or sexuality or race, skin color,. all tax rates and fees for financial services are equally applied to male or females...&quot;he&quot; often earns more because he does more hours, has more complex complex skills that a woman would choose to do and get same rate of pay..if they were willing.. but they are not. Why dont you encourage more women to take equal opportunity to run their own business and be plumbers, builders, brickies, garbage collectors, roofers, gardeners, corporate CEO&#39;s working 80hrs a week on HUGE negotiated contracts and even it up instead of blaming the system for inequality - there is plenty of equal opportunity here...and without further break down of traditional family values, it cant get much better but the effect seems to be worse to have women expected to work full time to help bring in the money for mortgage or lifestyle, as well as raise their families when we generally not wired that way.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Apps ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 17:09:43 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Rod F ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Can&#39;t agree more with Justin and SY. The misuse of statistics by the &quot;women are disadvantaged&quot; lobby is becoming an avalanche. For a married couple, use of tax concessions is often strategic - and certainly not determined by gender.</p>
<p>And the author seems to be suggesting a gender basis be introduced into the tax act to penalize men on the basis of their gender. So much for fairness!</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Rod F ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 18:29:12 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Leonie Y ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>What a lot of rubbish. I am a female and I am entitled to all of the above. I have invested in a number of ways and have worked and saved hard while looking after my own financial independence. Any woman can do the same. For those married and (maybe) at a disadvantage, they may benefit in other ways as other commenters have stated as a part of a couple, they are also reaping the benefits through their husbands tax advantages. Also, I was a single mum with four children and did this on my own.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Leonie Y ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:10:26 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Oliver ILLI ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Lisa said it, well done. Instead of bringing the top down why not help lift the bottom up. Encourage to do better, strife for the higher or better, adapt, what are the others doing that I could copy to make my situation better.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Oliver ILLI ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:01:12 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Fred Langores ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Ridiculous article, show us a tax law that only benefits to men. Women have the same opportunities than men, and maybe more. Stop trying to get readership by dividing people</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Fred Langores ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 19:47:44 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Pat Gardiner ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>As mentioned earlier in the comments, Please stop with the &quot;disadvantage to women&quot; rhetoric. Also, can you give numbers for the &quot;proportion of tax paid by men compared to women&quot; statistics that are touched on in the article?</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Pat Gardiner ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2021 05:07:56 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Pat Gardiner ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Agreed!</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Pat Gardiner ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2021 05:08:38 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>