<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - Millennials are beating boomers when it comes to super</title>
	<description>Millennials might feel left behind when it comes to the property market, but there is one area of finance where they will be better off: superannuation.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=179796893</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:44:28 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:44:28 +1000</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Cam Simpson ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>It sometimes feels that Boomers and Gen Y are having a competition between themselves at family BBQs, and then need to write about it. It would be nice if the War Babies generation, or Gen X or Gen Z were included in these public discussions.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Cam Simpson ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:44:28 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by D Lin ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>I completely agree. Traditional media and to a similar extent social media is very much dominated by only discussing these two generations.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>D Lin ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 12:24:53 +1000</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>