<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - Market wrap: This week's best and worst performing stocks</title>
	<description>Which share prices rose and which ones fell on the ASX this week? Dale Gillham reveals the winners and losers in this week's market wrap.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=179797187</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:20:51 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:20:51 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Mark Hutchins ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>Typical media scaremongering &quot;If the average couple retires at 65 with $320,000 in superannuation, and assuming they live for 17 years in retirement, it means they will have approximately $18,800 per year to live on&quot; Why do you not mention the aged pension they will be entitled to ON TOP of this payout from superannuation?? The investment and money industry is so constant in their failure to mention the AGED pension combined with super scenarios - but then again where would the headline be in that??</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hutchins ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2022 11:20:51 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>