<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>Money magazine Comments - How much you can save with Money's Best of the Best</title>
	<description>You could be $40,000 better off by ditching the average in each category for this year's Best of the Best winners.</description>
	<link>https://www.moneymag.com.au/feed/latest?story=179802452</link>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2024 17:08:05 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2024 17:08:05 +1100</pubDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2026 Money magazine</copyright>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Giuseppe De Filippo ()</title>
		<link></link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><p>I love Money Magazine but beware of self-celebration: past performance is not an indicator of future performance and these awards are telling us the best for this year, but not the best of next year. Some of the awarded companies constantly figure at the top year after year, so in these cases Money&#39;s awards go a long way since for these the outlook is more certain. But rarely managed funds or ETF repeat themselves and picking one of this year&#39;s top ones does not necessarily means picking a good performer for the 2024.</p></p><p><a href="">Reply to article</a></p><p>For original story, <a href="">Click Here.</a></p>
]]></description>
		<dc:creator>Giuseppe De Filippo ()</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2024 17:08:05 +1100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>