The truth about the new $3m super tax rules

By

Australians with multimillion-dollar super balances will face higher taxes under the federal government's revised super tax proposal, while low-income earners will also receive a boost to their retirement savings.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers confirmed today that from July 1 next year, earnings on super balances above $3 million will be taxed at 30%, up from 15%.

A new tier will apply to accounts over $10 million, taxed at 40%. About 90,000 Australians will be affected, including 9000 in the top tier.

The truth about the new $3m super tax rules

Both thresholds will be indexed to prevent bracket creep, and the government has dropped its most controversial element, taxing unrealised capital gains, after warnings it would penalise investors who hadn't sold assets.

"This morning on my recommendation, the cabinet agreed practical changes to make the superannuation system stronger, fairer and more sustainable," Chalmers told reporters.

The $3 million super tax: original plan, backlash and revisions

The new tax rules, called Division 296, was first announced in March 2023 and scheduled to start in July this year.

The proposal followed Treasury data revealing that 39% of super tax concessions flow to the top 10% of income earners.

The measure was expected to raise about $2 billion in its first full year. Chalmers says the revised plan will raise slightly less than the original, costing the budget $4.2 million mainly because of the one-year delay.

Over the long term, revenue will be much lower because the thresholds will be indexed to inflation.

The plan faced mounting criticism even from within Labor and was never introduced to parliament.

In June, Chalmers defended the changes, saying concessions remain "very generous" and opposition came from a small group of high-balance holders.

"We're not scrapping concessions for large balances," Chalmers said. "We're still offering generous tax breaks, just slightly less generous."

Last week, Treasury deputy secretary Diane Brown told a Senate estimates hearing the government is still considering changes to the $3 million super tax proposal.

She said the Prime Minister's office had raised questions about the bill.

"It's probably not unusual for that to occur from time to time. It remains unlegislated, and so stakeholders continue to raise questions about the bill," Brown said.

Division 296 scraps tax on unrealised gains

Perhaps the biggest change is that the tax will no longer apply to unrealised capital gains, addressing one of the strongest criticisms of the original proposal.

This would have meant it was taxed even without selling assets, which would've spelled bad news for investors.

This prompted panic selling among self-managed super fund (SMSF) holders.

CPA Australia was relieved to see the government change course on its this provision.

"This was a particularly egregious element of the government's initial proposal," says Richard Webb, the accounting body's superannuation lead.

"Providing certainty and financial stability for this and future generations of retirees is critical. Taxing unrealised gains would have distorted our tax system, which needs broader reform."

Bryn Evans, a private wealth adviser at Integro Private Wealth, says the changes are a win for people who hold assets like farmland because tax will only apply when the land is sold and cash is available, rather than on paper increases in value.

However, Evans warns the announcement left some questions unanswered, particularly around capital gains.

Super funds currently receive a one-third discount on gains for assets held longer than 12 months, but it's unclear if that will continue.

"Without such a discount, there may still be implications for how assets like farmland are owned," he says.

Evans also points to the complexity of implementing the new rules.

"Now that members within a fund will be taxed at different rates on earnings, there could be a need for super funds to do more work," he says.

"It will be interesting to see how the government tackles this and what costs will be incurred by funds and their members to comply."

Boost for low-income earners

Alongside the crackdown on large balances, the government will increase the Low Income Super Tax Offset (LISTO) from $500 to $810 and expand eligibility to workers earning up to $45,000 from 2027.

Women in Super CEO Jo Kowalczyk called the move "a monumental victory for fairness," saying low-income workers - mostly women - have been short-changed by $3 billion since 2020.

For women in the lowest brackets, the change could mean up to $60,000 more at retirement, helping close the gender gap in super savings.

"This reform is particularly significant for the women who form the backbone of our essential services - carers, education aides, hospitality workers, sales assistants, and health workers," says Kowalczyk.

"Realigning the LISTO ensures the tax concessions paid to low-paid workers are consistent with the objective of our superannuation system and addresses a key economic imperative to ensure tax concessions are more effectively targeted."

Get stories like this in our newsletters.

Related Stories

TAGS

Ryan Johnson was a journalist at Money from October 2024 to April 2026. He previously worked covering the Australian and New Zealand mortgage and banking industries. He has also written on superannuation, insurance, and personal finance. Ryan has a Bachelor of Communication (Journalism) from Curtin University, Perth. Connect with Ryan Johnson on LinkedIn.
Comments
Marc Dwyer
October 16, 2025 1.29pm

While I have nothing like 3 million in my super account I can see it causing problems for people who have lived a high income lifestyle, then suddenly having to really budget after the extra tax. Maybe I'm wrong.

On the flip side I just read a story on here about 1 in 7 living below the poverty line, and have now just read what I believe is saying is if you earn $45,000 or under they've increased how much extra you can make voluntary extra payments.

Or have I just read that part wrong?

Monica Beran
October 19, 2025 11.46am

I'm 89 I'm getting out of my SMSF to spend it and share it before the tax man thinks of any other devious way he can get into the honeypot. It's quite disgraceful. On the one hand they spend billions on nuclear submarine which would be inadequate (one not enough for our coastline) and light train in Canberra whereby our property rates are increasing every year by unreasonable amounts i could go.on so they're looking for a honey pot and they found one. Well I for one will short cut this rort.

I would advise young ones wait for your pension and enjoy your money while you're young. God knows what other changes to your detriment they will think of.

Andrew james
February 10, 2026 11.46am

Good on you Monica.

Super is their own creation and only one of very few good ideas from Labour. It is now a huge pot sitting and growing for retirees to enjoy their retirement not for government revenue.

The vultures in Canberra see this as their money. Their spending is out of control, propping up the bludgers and the great unwashed.

Keep your balance below 3 mill and give to your children and grandchildren.

If the idiots in Canberra change the rules again to assist with their wasteful spending, move quickly to negate their stupidity.

helly ripphin
October 20, 2025 10.04pm

How do they decide what is a $3m 'balance'? If it is no longer applied to unrealised gains...does that mean that none of it is taxed at a higher rate...because you have not realised ANY of your super until you withdraw it and spend it? For example, you invest in super at 20 years of age. If you bust your butt to study hard, get into a profession with extreme responsibility but a higher salary, (well deserved due to the very high level of responsibility) then contribute at maximum rate allowable to super until you are 65, you would easily reach $3m, using the law of compounding over those 45 years. Even if you contribute at the legislated minimum, with only your levy percentage, you would reach that amount. So why are they penalising people who work crazy hard, take on massive responsibility in their working lives - and are paid a higher amount through their lives? SUper is mandatory, it is not a choice, so why punish those people?

Andrew james
February 10, 2026 11.24am

They do this because the Labour Party believe everyone is equal and should be treated as such. We are not. Plenty of bludgers in this country.

Your comments are spot on. No incentive to study hard, work hard or save for your retirement hard.

Super is to save for your own retirement pension, not rely on the government. These vultures in Canberra have forgotten that. I agree with you, young ones should spend their money as they earn it and wait for the gov pension and use their mandatory only contributions as Super.

IAN CRIMMINS
October 22, 2025 5.31pm

The $10 million threshold should have been set at $5 million. It is good to see that the thresholds have been indexed.

There is no circular economic benefit from people having non-financial assets in superannuation and action is required to encourage people to remove such assets from their superannuation. The taxing of unrealised gains in superannuation may have achieved this.

People with superannuation exceeding $3m to $5m are not building their superannuation for the true purposes of superannuation. Rather, they are doing so for tax avoidance, Estate and inheritance purposes.

Andrew james
February 10, 2026 11.35am

Ian,

It is their money to do with what they please.

Give to their children now would be a good idea, however who knows how much is enough to have in Super with prices going up exponentially year on year. What if another GFC or Covid comes along and wipes out a large chunk of your balance. Super is to save for your retirement. Yes a few richies have abused the system, but don't penalise those for being astute investors and receiving above average returns over their working life.

You must work for the Labour Party with your discriminative comments. Not everyone is equal, get used to it. Some people study hard, work hard, and save hard and a higher Super balance at retirement is their reward.