Why property investors are getting out now

By

Investor confidence in the property market is wobbling, with new data showing many landlords would quit if negative gearing or capital gains tax (CGT) breaks were wound back.

The 2025 Annual Property Investor Sentiment Survey by the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) found 53% would stop investing if negative gearing was altered, while another 25% were unsure. Only 22% said they would keep investing under new rules.

Under negative gearing, if your rental property costs more to run than it earns, you can claim the loss as a tax deduction. Critics argue it pushes up house prices, while supporters say it keeps rental supply flowing.

Why property investors are getting out now

The debate has reignited after a separate report by housing campaign group Everybody's Home estimated tax breaks for short-stay properties like Airbnb and Stayz could cost the federal budget up to $556 million a year.

It is calling for an end to negative gearing on new investments, a phase-out of deductions on existing ones, and the removal of the CGT discount.

"Tax breaks need to be wound back for all investors, but it's even harder to justify giving these generous benefits to short-stay operators," says Everybody's Home spokesperson Maiy Azize.

"The system is propping up investors who are speculating on short-term rentals during the worst housing crisis in living memory," Azize says.

But PIPA chair Lachlan Vidler warned the sector is already fragile.

"Our figures show a clear erosion of confidence," he says. "The mere suggestion of changes to negative gearing or CGT is enough to destabilise investor sentiment."

Shrinking rental stock

Investor exits are accelerating. The PIPA survey found 16.7% sold at least one property in the past year - the highest level since the survey began in 2022.

The survey found that only 42% of sold properties remained in the rental pool because they were bought by other investors.

Meanwhile, 37% were purchased by owner-occupiers and 25% by first-home buyers, effectively removing them from rental circulation.

Equally however, these owner-occupiers wouldn't be competing for rental properties any more - though that is far from the only factor driving demand.

Vidler says Australians are watching the "slow dismantling" of Australia's rental supply, and tenants are paying the price through rising rents and reduced availability.

"This isn't just a continuation of last year's trend - it's an acceleration," he says.

Interestingly, it's seasoned investors who are choosing to exit the market. Out of those who had sold, more than half had held their property for at least five years, with the most common holding period being 10 to 20 years (30.7%).

Vidler says the implications for renters are severe.

"The private rental market is losing stock at a time when demand is surging, and policy uncertainty is only making things worse."

State reforms add pressure

Federal tax policy isn't the only concern among investors, with state-level reforms weighing them down.

PIPA found 64% of investors were unaware of Victoria's new vacant residential land tax, while 60% admitted they had limited knowledge of tenancy law changes nationally.

"This is a failure of engagement," Vidler says. "Investors are being asked to navigate increasingly complex regulatory environments with little support or clarity."

More than a third of investors now believe it's a good time to sell, citing the risk of federal reforms (51.3%), rising compliance costs (49.8%) and state charges such as land tax (49.8%). Concerns about rental caps also rose to 37.1%.

"These results reflect a broader unease among investors who feel they're being squeezed from all sides," says Vidler. "If this trend continues, we'll see even greater strain on the rental market, and tenants will bear the brunt."

Fragile optimism

Despite the gloom, almost 60% of respondents still see the next 12 months as a good time to invest.

"There's still belief in the fundamentals of property investment, but that belief is more fragile," says Vidler.

"If governments want to preserve the integrity of the rental market, they must listen to investors, provide clarity, and avoid knee-jerk reforms that risk doing more harm than good."

Get stories like this in our newsletters.

Related Stories

Ryan Johnson was a journalist at Money from October 2024 to April 2026. He previously worked covering the Australian and New Zealand mortgage and banking industries. He has also written on superannuation, insurance, and personal finance. Ryan has a Bachelor of Communication (Journalism) from Curtin University, Perth. Connect with Ryan Johnson on LinkedIn.
Comments
Peta Morrison
September 17, 2025 7.39pm

We are investors who have owned multiple properties for years. Whilst your article is valid I think it misses the point of how difficult it is to be a landlord in a tenants world. We've just spent tens of thousands updating a property after terrible tenants when all we received was a $1300 bond refund which we had to prove. Rubbish removal alone over $6000. I'm sure it's a major reason of why investors want out. We certainly want out. It resonates me as sad, if people can't afford to buy, someone, somehow has to provide places for renters and it's not going to come from government coffers.

Greg Byrne
September 19, 2025 8.57am

This article is so right. As a property investor for the past 14 years with 2 houses, am about to sell the second in a twelve month period. We are so over it. Tired of the stress and paying out money all the time. It's laughable to think that investors with stay on if negative gearing is abolished. Owning an investment property now is untenable and set to get worse with more compliance, costs and less rights. Can't wait to get out of it. People can't believe how much extra we are out of pocket each year to keep them going although not as much as those in Sydney $40,000-60,000 a year. And yes, final sale prices are disappointing, only coming off slightly better than if we left money in fixed term deposit. Run a mile!

Paul Oliver
September 20, 2025 4.39pm

Both state and federal governments say they're trying to solve the housing crisis but then hit landlords with all kinds of imposts and regulations which limit their ability to control their properties and simply reduce their return on investment. The groups advocating for tenants rights have gone too far in taking control of the property from the owner/landlord and giving it to the tenant, so landlords are opting out. It's true that some properties are being resold to investors but the majority go to private owners, reducing the rental stock and ultimately increasing rent. People don't realise that a private buyer lives in the house on their own or as a couple but when the house was in the rental pool it was probably shared by 3 or 4 people.

Dave Drew
November 13, 2025 10.02am

I only got into property investing and stayed afloat because of negative gearing. One property was worth $100,000 less when I looked into selling it at one stage when I was seriously ill for a few years. Now Ive recovered and the market has recovered I can easily sell. But when I do the numbers they still don't stack up against a quality share portfolio without all the stress of owing banks tonnes of cash. Negative gearing has certainly helped me hold onto that investment property, and I will eventually gain a benefit. I agree with all comments I have read on here. Being a Landlord is overrated and can be stressful. In saying that, I don't understand why high net worth individuals can grow massive property portfolios using negative gearing. Ive read multiple news articles and books with individuals explaining how they own 4,5,...10+ properties all negative geared. If we deem negative gearing for property is appropriate into the future then it would be easy to wind it back a bit. Say, offer negative gearing on the first (or even include a second) investment property. Being able to Negative gear many properties I don't feel is right. Our kids and grand kids will need homes, that they cannot negative gear on their home, and they have to compete to buy a property against a range of high net worth property investors. Yeah ok, they can Rentvest, but that just adds more risk and complexity to the equation. The balance is just not right at the moment. Less rights for landlords will definitely tip me over the edge and I'll sell the investment property. But now Im also squeezed between that and the strong emotions about how my young adult kids will navigate their own path getting started with a home to live in.

Michael Parker
December 31, 2025 5.13pm

Without negative gearing I would have never purchased an investment property.