Where solar pays for itself fastest in Australia

By

Published on

Solar panels remain one of the most reliable ways to shrink a power bill, but the speed at which they pay for themselves varies sharply depending on where you live.

New analysis from iSelect shows that the payback period on a standard 6.6kW system can differ by more than five years across Australia's capital cities.

The findings come as households navigate rising electricity prices, falling feed-in tariffs and new government programs such as Solar Sharer, which, from next July, will offer free daytime electricity for at least three hours in participating states.

solar power

General manager - utilities at iSelect, Julia Paszka, says usage habits have a huge impact on how quickly solar pays off.

"Solar panels can be a great way to cut your power bills, but to really maximise the benefits, it's important to use as much of your solar energy as possible during the day," Paszka says.

"Any excess power you don't use will usually be sent back to the grid, but the rate you've paid for this 'feed-in' is typically much lower than what you pay for electricity from the grid."

Which capital cities have the fastest solar payback?

Payback times depend on factors such as installation cost, energy plan, solar exposure and how much of your own solar you use during daylight hours.

To give households a clearer picture, iSelect modelled a standard 6.6kW system across all major cities.

Perth leads the pack for light-usage households (around 4kWh a day), with solar paying for itself in roughly four years and nine months. That's almost half Melbourne's eight years and 11 months, one of the slowest results in the country - partly due to weak feed-in tariffs, which have even dipped into negative territory this year.

For mid-range users (around 7kWh), Perth stays on top at three years and eight months, helped by relatively low system costs, high electricity prices and abundant sunshine.

At higher usage levels (10kWh a day), Adelaide takes the crown, with a payback period of two years and nine months, narrowly ahead of Perth at three years.

Hobart sits at the other end of the spectrum. Despite reasonable feed-in tariffs, its high system costs and low sunlight exposure stretch payback to six years and seven months for mid-range users and close to six years for high users.

Battery rebates slash payback times

Adding a battery can dramatically change the economics of going solar. Payback periods depend on battery size, installation costs, your energy plan and how much power you use during both day and night.

Larger batteries often offer better value per kilowatt-hour, because many installation costs are fixed. A bigger system looks more expensive upfront but can deliver a lower installed cost overall.

Government incentives can tilt the equation further.

The Cheaper Home Batteries Program, launched on July 30, offers about a 30% discount for households with solar (or those adding it at the same time).

That kind of support can shave thousands off upfront costs and bring battery payback times down considerably.

iSelect modelled the standard system paired with a 12kWh battery across all capital cities, and the differences are noticeable.

Adelaide leads at every usage level, with payback ranging from eight years and six months (low usage) to five years and six months (high usage).

Sydney ranks second for medium and high users, largely due to high electricity prices that households can avoid by drawing from stored solar at night.

Hobart and Melbourne have the slowest payback periods due to weaker sunlight and higher system costs.

Why some cities deliver faster solar savings

Not all cities receive the same sunlight, and that matters. Solar energy output directly reflects how much sun hits your panels.

Based on Bureau of Meteorology data, the Northern Territory has the strongest year-round solar exposure, with Darwin recording around 21.45 MJ/m² per day.

Sunshine is consistent across the northern half of the country, which explains why cities like Perth, Brisbane and Darwin tend to show faster payback.

At the other end of the spectrum, Greater Hobart averages just 3.03kWh per day across the year, the lowest in the country.

Melbourne isn't far behind. Even so, lower solar exposure doesn't make solar a bad investment; it simply extends the payback period and makes daytime self-consumption even more important.

Of course, Paszka says not every household can afford solar panels or has the right space to install them.

"But that doesn't mean you can't save on energy or make greener choices," she says.

"Shopping around for a better energy plan, exploring renewable energy options from your retailer, and taking steps to improve energy efficiency at home - like upgrading appliances, reducing wastage, or using smart devices to optimise electricity use - can all help you cut costs and lower your carbon footprint."

Get stories like this in our newsletters.

Related Stories

Ryan Johnson was a journalist at Money from October 2024 to April 2026. He previously worked covering the Australian and New Zealand mortgage and banking industries. He has also written on superannuation, insurance, and personal finance. Ryan has a Bachelor of Communication (Journalism) from Curtin University, Perth. Connect with Ryan Johnson on LinkedIn.
Comments
Jenny Ann
December 1, 2025 10.53am

The reality of this story is incorrect.

They base that everything will be done during the hrs of 9am to 3pm during summer.

They fail to take into account people working during the week.

Showering, cooking, washing during the week for most people do not happen during that time.

7 cents feed in is also very low

Barry O'Barrel
December 1, 2025 11.05am

Most dishwashers and washing machines can be scheduled to run at a later time. That's what I do.