Ask Paul: Should I close my self-managed super fund?

By

Dear Paul,

I have a property in a self-managed fund that has given us a boost from $180,000 in super to $550,000 in the space of four years.

However, with body corporate fees, life and TPD premiums, compliance and everything else, it's adding up (around $14,000 a year), not to mention the SMSF's $38,000 mortgage.

ask paul clitheroe should i close my smsf?

My fear is that it won't grow before retirement, and my accountant says to diversify and buy exchange traded funds (ETFs).

At the age of 52, I'm unsure whether to stick it out or pull rank and go back into a traditional fund.

We're not in a position to make additional personal contributions as we're currently paying off our home loan.

I am wondering if we cash out to a traditional fund, how much would our super roughly grow between now and retirement as opposed leaving it in my SMSF? - Sonya

Wow, Sonya, the property has really given your super a boost.

How you tackle your investment strategy from here is an interesting question. My overriding view is that a good investment tends to keep on being a good investment and a bad investment tends to keep on being a bad investment.

So, I am not sure why you think the property will not grow in value over the next decade or so to your retirement. Yes, it is costing you $14,000 a year, plus mortgage repayments on $38,000, but it has increased in value dramatically.

If there are some particular issues around the property, meaning it will not grow in value, fair enough, you should sell it. But I want you to question why this very good investment becomes a poor investment.

Once you review that, then the options you outline are fine. If you do decide to sell, ETFs inside your current super fund are a perfectly good idea.

Moving your funds to a traditional low-cost super fund is also fine. In terms of returns, a decent, low-cost super fund has returned around 8%-10% a year for decades from a balanced or growth option. This will also be a diversified option.

But first up you need to decide if you are keeping the property. If you decide to sell it, then I doubt that well-chosen, broadly based ETFs or a low-cost super fund will perform 
very differently.

It is more about whether you wish to keep your SMSF going, with its associated costs, or whether you prefer a good quality, large, low-cost, publicly available super fund and reduce the costs and time you need to put into your SMSF.

Learn to Love Your Super with Money!

Get stories like this in our newsletters.

Related Stories

The government has backed a Greens push to stop SMSFs using borrowed money to buy residential property, a move supporters say could help first-home buyers but critics warn will hurt retirement savers.
TAGS

Paul Clitheroe AM is the founder of Money and serves as the publication's editorial adviser. One of Australia's most trusted personal finance experts, Paul has spent decades helping Australians build wealth, manage debt and make smarter money decisions. He is widely known for host­ing the Money TV program and authoring best-selling personal finance books. Since launching Money in 1999, he has played a leading role in delivering practical, independent financial guidance to Australians. Paul is chair of InvestSMART Financial Services. He was the founding chair of Ecstra Foundation, a national not-for-profit focused on improving financial wellbeing, from 2018 to 2026, and led the Australian Government's Financial Literacy Board and Financial Literacy Australia from 2004 to 2019. In academia, Paul is chair in financial literacy at Macquarie University, where he is also a Professor in the School of Business and Economics. Ask Paul your money question. Due to volume, Paul cannot respond to questions posted in the comments section.