Ask Paul: Is interest-only better for my home loan?

By

Hi Paul,

I have seen suggestions that an interest-only loan is better than principal and interest on the basis that a home increases in value.

Would a good option be to put the difference into super for maximum benefit in the long term? - Norm

Ask Paul Is interest-only or principal and interest better for my home loan

This is a really interesting question, Norm. It is relevant to so many people and, while it is a short question, it has a lot of personal complexity.

If a loan is on an investment property, it makes sense to pay interest only as the interest costs, maintenance and running costs of the property are tax deductible.

The key rule of debt repayment is straightforward. Pay the highest rate first, so that means high-interest credit cards, then things such as car loans, possibly your non-tax-deductible home loan and probably not the interest-only investment loans.

Now we'd better clear up 'possibly' and 'probably'. Let's assume your home loan is 6%.

Any principal repayments into your mortgage or a decent offset account effectively earn 6% tax and are risk free. Now this is a good return. If you were a typical taxpayer, you'd need a term deposit paying 10% to match that return after tax.

Bluntly, I also find that despite our best intentions to just pay interest and invest the balance, we actually spend the amount we would have paid into a principal and interest loan. This is not a technical answer, but it is a realistic human answer.

I reckon most of us are better off with a principal and interest loan. Also, your cheapest loan over time is likely to be a principal and interest loan.

Now to a deductible loan. Again, let's use 6% interest, though an investment loan is likely to be higher.

An average taxpayer would be paying about 4% after the deduction, a high taxpayer closer to 3%.

The point here is, can we earn more than the rate we are paying? At 3% or 4% we can.

We'd be better off applying any extra money to our home loan, our super or investments over the long term.

The history of shares, including dividends, shows an average annual return of close to 10%. Super, since the inception of compulsory super, has seen returns in the typical balance fund of 8% to 9%.

My view is to consider your personality and discipline to save and invest, the rate you are paying on a loan, the long-term earning rate on other investments, your attitude to risk and, of course, your personal rate of tax.

This will take you to a conclusion that is best for you.

Get stories like this in our newsletters.

Related Stories

Paul Clitheroe AM is the founder of Money and serves as the publication's editorial adviser. One of Australia's most trusted personal finance experts, Paul has spent decades helping Australians build wealth, manage debt and make smarter money decisions. He is widely known for host­ing the Money TV program and authoring best-selling personal finance books. Since launching Money in 1999, he has played a leading role in delivering practical, independent financial guidance to Australians. Paul is chair of InvestSMART Financial Services. He was the founding chair of Ecstra Foundation, a national not-for-profit focused on improving financial wellbeing, from 2018 to 2026, and led the Australian Government's Financial Literacy Board and Financial Literacy Australia from 2004 to 2019. In academia, Paul is chair in financial literacy at Macquarie University, where he is also a Professor in the School of Business and Economics. Ask Paul your money question. Due to volume, Paul cannot respond to questions posted in the comments section.