The family cars now hit by the Luxury Car Tax

By

The Luxury Car Tax (LCT) saw significant changes from July 1, 2025, with a number of mainstream family cars now falling foul of new rules.

The federal government applies LCT to passenger vehicles that have a list price of more than $80,567 (before on-road costs and options/accessories) for "Other Vehicles" that are not classified as "Fuel-efficient" - those models have a higher threshold of $91,387.

In previous years the LCT thresholds have increased in line with inflation, but for the new financial year from July 1, 2025, the dollar figures remained the same, with LCT charged at 33c per dollar spent over the threshold limit.

the toyota kluger grande is one of the family cars now hit by the luxury car tax

However, there has been a big change to what constitutes a "fuel-efficient" vehicle under the legislation, with the government adjusting the description to make it significantly harder for regular cars to meet the requirement.

From the ATO: "From 1 July 2025, a fuel-efficient car is defined as a vehicle that has a fuel consumption that does not exceed 3.5 litres per 100 kilometres as a combined rating under the vehicle standards in force under section 12 of the Road Vehicle Standards Act 2018."

Previously vehicles needed to have fuel use of 7.0L/100km or less to meet the standard - with this jump meaning a number of new cars now fail to meet the requirement.

An example is the $85,135 Toyota Kluger Grande Hybrid - which was previously classed as "fuel-efficient" with an official fuel consumption figure of 5.6 litres per 100km - and now doesn't meet the requirement, and therefore means mums and dads will have to fork out more for the high-grade family seven-seater.

Another car that costs more now than it did before is a Lexus NX 350h hybrid, with a fuel use number of 5.0L/100km - hardly a gas guzzler. But buyers will have to fork out an extra few grand to get into one of those due to this change in conditions.

There are examples of vehicles that do meet the new strict obligations.

The plug-in hybrid (PHEV) Mazda CX-80 GT P40e ($84,048), for example, has an official fuel use number of 2.7 litres per 100km, because it has a large battery pack that allows electric-only driving.

However, there are no vehicles on the market in Australia that have a fuel use figure of 3.5L/100km (or less) that don't have some form of electrification - they're mainly PHEVs, and they typically have outlandishly low combined cycle fuel use figures.

We won't get into the misleading nature of "official" fuel consumption numbers here, but just know that there are now dozens of vehicles that have become more expensive because of the change in calculations, from those family SUVs to luxury models from Audi and BMW.

And if you're thinking that fully electric cars are exempt, think again; they fall under the fuel-efficient vehicle categorisation.

The Luxury Car Tax was designed as a protectionist measure to try and shield the Australian car manufacturing business, launching on July 1, 2000. It continues to hit new-car customers to this day, despite the fact that the final Australian-produced car rolled off the assembly line at Holden on October 20, 2017.

Get stories like this in our newsletters.

Related Stories

TAGS

Matt Campbell has been an automotive journalist and content creator for 15 years. He specialises in new car reviews, video content and news, and established the popular YouTube channel, The Right Car?. Matt was named Road Tester of the Year at the 2026 Newspress Australia Awards. On average, he has owned one car for each year he's had a licence, and he's based out of the lower Blue Mountains in NSW. Connect with Matt Campbell on LinkedIn.
Comments
Tony Smith
July 16, 2025 4.48pm

I agree with Matt

The luxiry car tax is stupid

Robert Dowling
July 16, 2025 5.55pm

Order Australians who haven't got super and accumulated savings to to fund their retirement don't get any help from the government.

Still pay taxes on income but saved the government millions by not drawing a government pension.

I believe this is unfair.

Brian Rayner
July 16, 2025 8.15pm

The LCT applies to too many four wheel drives and essential vehicles. It should have been cancelled years ago but the government doesn't want to give up its payday.